- #Deleted from geekbench over cheating allegations update
- #Deleted from geekbench over cheating allegations full
- #Deleted from geekbench over cheating allegations plus
#Deleted from geekbench over cheating allegations full
And even if it does, I don't know Mac software will be taking full advantage of it from Day 1. I'm not sure the initial Mac ARM silicon will necessarily have a lot of special custom Mac-oriented compute goodies. Will anybody notice? The initial ARM Macs may be underwhelming. It will potentially be a throwback to the Amiga days: a system with performance years ahead of competitors because of tight integration with custom hardware.ġ. Rather than hoping Intel's chips are good at the things it wants to do, it can specialize the silicone hardcore for the tasks it wants MacOS to do in the future. Apple and their full vertical integration will stand alone in the world here. Where Apple can really pull away is by leaning into custom compute units for specialized tasks. Eventually Apple's likely to hit a wall there too though, like Intel. Most are focusing on Apple's potential edge over Intel when it comes to general compute performance/watt. I think Apple sees this sort of thing as the future, and their true competitive advantage. for a regular web browsing type user obviously if you're compiling stuff this may not apply if that is true you're almost certainly better off just getting a Linux desktop for the heavy liftingĪpple can start leaning on their specialized ML If they're already shipping T2 on every machine, with a bunch of CPU cores, why not just make those CPU cores big enough for the main workload?ĭoubling CPU perf is meaningless if you can ship the right accelerators that'll do 100x energy/perf for video compression, crypto and graphics. They will probably put that stuff in T2 for Intel Macs. Apple can start leaning on their specialized ML cores and accelerators. Apple is going to save $200-$800 cost per Mac shipped
The big changes, I think, are more mundane: Similarly, while ARM parts are more efficient than x86 per compute cycle, it's not a dramatic change. Not one thing that they demoed requires any meaningful CPU power. Even if you had a theoretical CPU using zero energy, most people are not going to get 30% battery life gains. Once you look closely at power profiles on modern machines you'll see that most energy is going into display and GPU.
I'm predicting the opposite: you won't actually see any difference. > So, I’m predicting an MBP 13 - 16 range with an extra three hours of battery life+, and 20-30% faster. I don’t imagine that developing Intel server binaries on an ARM laptop with Rust will be pleasant. Rust seems behind on ARM, for instance I bet that will change in the next year or two. Languages like Go with supremely simple cross architecture support might get a boost here. I’m not highly conversant with ARM linux, but in my mind I imagine it’s still largely a second class citizen - I wonder if systems developers will get on board, deal with slower / higher battery draw intel virtualization, or move on from Apple. One interesting question I think is outstanding - from parsing the video carefully, it seems to me that devs are going to want ARM linux virtualized, vs AMD64. I think they may also start making a real push on the ML side in the next year, which will be very interesting it’s exciting to imagine what Apple’s fully vertically integrated company could do controlling hardware, OS and ML stack. You’re not going to want an Intel mac even as of January of 2021, unless you have a very unusual set of requirements.
#Deleted from geekbench over cheating allegations plus
Alternately a Macbook Air type with 16 hours plus strong 4k performance. So, I’m predicting an MBP 13 - 16 range with an extra three hours of battery life+, and 20-30% faster. Early days they are likely to plow all this back into performance, a win for consumers. They are going to be able to put this margin back into a combination of profit and tech budget as they choose. Search this fine site for complaints about how new mac laptops don’t have real performance benefits over old ones - those complaints are 100% down to being saddled with Intel.Īpple has a functional corporate culture that ships adding complete control of the hardware stack in is going to make for better products, full stop.Īpple has to pay Intel and AMD profit margins for their mac systems.
#Deleted from geekbench over cheating allegations update
I presume their consumer hardware will launch with an A13Z, or maybe an A14 type chip.Īpple has consistently shipped new chip designs on time Intel’s thrashing has cost them at least two significant update cycles on the macbook line in the last six years. This feels to me like it’s going to be great a big win for consumers and developers.Ĭurrent A12z chips are highly performant Apple is roughly one chip cycle ahead on perfomance/watt from any other manufacturer.
0 kommentar(er)
